Anúncios
Last Updated: October 2026
Anúncios
1. Why This Policy Exists
Job seekers make consequential decisions based on the information they read online. A single fabricated recruitment notification, an incorrect eligibility criterion, or a fake application link can cost a reader money, time, or an opportunity. sarkarimaster.co.in therefore treats fact-checking as the foundation of every article we publish, not as a final editorial step. This policy sets out how we verify claims, what standards we apply, and how we correct mistakes when they occur. It works alongside our Editorial Policy, which explains our broader publishing principles.
2. What We Verify
We distinguish between factual claims that must be verified and general guidance that reflects our editorial judgement. Factual claims include: the existence of a recruitment notification or drive; the name of the issuing organisation; vacancy counts; eligibility criteria such as age limits, educational qualifications, and experience requirements; salary figures and pay scales; application deadlines and procedures; official application URLs; and organisational details such as accreditation, affiliation, and location. General guidance — for example, advice on how to prepare an application or approach an interview — is labelled as guidance rather than fact.
3. How We Verify Government and Public-Sector Recruitment Claims
A large share of our coverage concerns government and public-sector recruitment, where accuracy is especially critical because candidates often travel long distances, pay application fees, and reorganise their plans around a single notification. This includes our guides on Kendriya Vidyalaya jobs, university jobs, Anganwadi jobs, Delhi AIIMS jobs, Railways jobs, and hospital jobs.
For each notification, our first check is always the originating source. An article is not published until a writer has located the official circular, departmental notice, institutional recruitment portal, or verified government employment page that announces the vacancy. Vacancy counts, post names, and eligibility criteria are taken directly from that source rather than from secondary summaries.
Where a notification is circulating on social media or WhatsApp forwards but cannot be traced to an official source, we treat it as unverified and either do not publish it or publish it with an explicit warning that it has not been confirmed. Fake government job websites and appointment letters are a persistent problem in India. We cross-check application links against official domains wherever possible, and we flag any recruitment that demands a registration fee, medical fee, or document-verification payment before an offer is confirmed.
4. How We Verify Private-Sector Recruitment Claims
Our private-sector coverage — including TCS jobs, Taj Hotel jobs, Vishal Mega Mart jobs, and personal taxi driver jobs — follows the same primary-source standard. Company vacancies are confirmed against the employer’s own career page or a verified recruitment portal. Where an article describes a large recruitment drive, we check that the drive is actually announced rather than merely anticipated, and we distinguish between confirmed vacancies and expected future hiring.
Salary figures are checked against the official notification or verifiable listing and are dated so readers know when the information was confirmed. Where pay varies by post, location, shift, or experience level, we present the range and explain the variables rather than quoting a single headline figure. Educational requirements — from 8th pass for support roles to postgraduate qualifications for teaching and specialist posts — are stated as they appear in the source and are not softened to widen the applicant pool.
5. How We Verify Application Links and Recruitment Channels
Because our articles direct readers to apply, the accuracy of application links is a safety issue, not just an editorial one. Before publication, every application link is checked to confirm it resolves to an official government domain, an institutional portal, or a verified company career page. Links are reviewed periodically, because broken or hijacked links in job content can direct readers to fraudulent intermediaries.
6. Sourcing Standards
We prefer primary sources: official circulars, government portals, institutional recruitment pages, and company career sites. Secondary sources — news reports, aggregator sites, and social media posts — are used to identify leads but are not treated as confirmation on their own. When a claim cannot be verified through a primary source, we say so in the article. We do not present unverified information as established fact, and we do not remove caveats to make an opportunity sound more attractive.
7. Non-Partisanship and Consistency
We apply the same verification standard to every claim we check, regardless of which department, institution, company, or sector it concerns. We do not concentrate our fact-checking on any one employer or recruitment authority. Our judgements are based on the evidence available, not on commercial relationships or external pressure.
8. Separation of Fact-Checking from Commercial Interest
Fact-checking must be independent of advertising and partnership relationships. No advertiser, recruitment agency, or employer can pay to have a claim verified, to have a caveat removed, or to have an unverified vacancy presented as confirmed. Where content is sponsored, it is labelled as sponsored, and the fact-checking standards described in this policy still apply.
9. Corrections and Updates
Errors happen. When a reader or our own review identifies a factual error — a wrong deadline, an incorrect salary figure, a broken application link, a misstated eligibility criterion, or an incorrect vacancy count — we correct it promptly. Where the correction materially changes the guidance a reader would take from the article, we add a visible note explaining what was changed. We do not silently delete errors. Readers can report suspected errors through our Contact Us page. Corrections are logged internally so that recurring problems in sourcing or verification can be addressed.
10. Transparency About Limits
We are a career-information platform, not a recruitment agency, a government department, or an employer. We verify what we can against official sources, but we cannot guarantee that an institution will honour a vacancy, that a selection process will proceed as announced, or that a salary quoted in a listing will be paid in practice. Where our information is time-sensitive — as with rolling recruitment or annual notification cycles — we date the article and advise readers to confirm details on the official application page before acting.
11. Reader Responsibility
We encourage readers to treat any job offer that demands upfront payment, requests sensitive documents before an official selection process, or cannot be traced to an official domain with suspicion. Our fact-checking reduces risk; it does not eliminate it. The final verification step — checking the official portal before paying or sharing personal information — belongs to the reader. We also urge readers to report suspected fraud through our Contact Us page so that we can warn others.
12. Contact
Questions about this policy, corrections, or fact-checking suggestions can be sent through our Contact Us page. We also invite you to read our Editorial Policy, Privacy Policy, GDPR Policy, and Disclaimer for a full picture of how the site operates.